Military Sexual Trauma | Law Offices of Peter S Cameron | Veteran PTSD Appeals



(800) 861-7262 Law Offices of Peter S. Cameron, Esq. Veteran Appeal

Military Sexual Trauma – MST

PTSD Military Sexual Trauma Denials due to “Unverified Stressor Event” or “Lack of Markers”

In 2018, the Veterans Administration audited all the Post Traumatic Stress Disorder claims related to Military Sexual Trauma (PTSD MST) that it received in 2017. Claims examiners denied roughly half of those applications.

The high denial rate did not surprise most VA disability attorneys. High denial rates are extremely common, mostly because the claims examiner only views one side of the story during the initial review.

What was surprising was the fact that, in many cases, claims examiners disregarded procedures and denied claims that should have been approved. In other words, unless you have an experienced attorney, the merits of your PTSD MST claim may be irrelevant. The claims examiner might deny it anyway.

Most of the handling errors involved either a misapplication of the underlying law or a failure to properly evaluate circumstantial evidence.

Unverified Stressor

In this context, “stressor” is a euphemistic term for a sexual assault. Generally, to receive PTSD benefits, there must be a triggering event in the claimant’s service record.

But PTSD MST claims do not fall under these general rules. Normally, victims do not report military sexual assaults, even months or years after they occurred. Some victims do not want to relive the trauma of that event, while others fear retaliation. Coming forward in any way, even by filing a claim for disability benefits, is a big risk, even in the #MeToo era.

The applicable regulation places sexual trauma in the “assault” category. Under this liberalized view, claimants do not need to have a stressor event in their files. In the case of MST, such an event is almost never there.

Nevertheless, the claimant must still establish that a service-related incident caused the PTSD. This requirement makes it important to properly evaluate the circumstantial evidence in the claim, as outlined below.

“Lack of Markers” Denials

Essentially, markers are circumstantial evidence that support PTSD MST claims. The aforementioned liberalization does not just apply to the claim category. This standard also applies to marker evaluation. As a result, claims examiners may take a vast array of circumstantial evidence into account, such as:

Performance Changes:
PTSD symptoms like flashbacks and nightmares make it difficult to function at work.

Substance Abuse:
Substance Abuse: PTSD patients often self-medicate with alcohol or painkillers

STD and Pregnancy Tests:
Most people do not request such tests unless they believe they may be pregnant or may have a sexually transmitted disease.

Transfer Requests:
Transfer Requests: Similarly, most transfer requests do not come out of nowhere.

Such requests are classic PTSD reactions.

In general, it is difficult to obtain convictions in criminal court with circumstantial evidence. The burden of proof is too high. But in most VA disability claims, the burden of proof is only at least as likely as not. So, if the victim can point to at least two of the items on the above list, there may be enough circumstantial evidence to support the claim.

The absence of records may be significant. For example, if the victim’s background includes any of the markers listed above and there was no sexual assault report to civilian authorities, that lack of information along with the victim’s testimony may be sufficient to establish a service connection.

PTSD MST are different from ordinary PTSD disability claims. For a free consultation with an experienced veterans disability lawyer in San Diego, contact the Law Offices of Peter S. Cameron, Esq. at 800-861-7262 or fill out the contact box to your right. We are here to represent veterans nationwide.

More on PTSD….
PTSD
PTSD Claim Denied
PTSD and Individual Unemployability Denial
Smoking and PTSD
Symptoms of PTSD
PTSD Review DBQ
PTSD Nexus Letter
PTSD and Physical Health
Combat-Related PTSD

US COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS
SPECIAL MONTHLY COMPENSATION
TOTAL DISABILITY INDIVIDUAL UNEMPLOYABILITY
DISABILITIES DUE TO AGENT ORANGE EXPOSURE
DEPENDENCY INDEMNITY COMPENSATION
POST TRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER (PTSD)

There is no fee unless we win.

Law Offices of Peter S. Cameron, Esq.

We handle claims nationwide.

Source: Youtube