Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Gottshall Case Brief Summary | Law Case Explained



Get more case briefs explained with Quimbee. Quimbee has over 16,300 case briefs (and counting) keyed to 223 casebooks ►

Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Gottshall | 512 U.S. 532 (1994)

Railroad workers in turn-of-the-century America often suffered serious injuries and even death on the job. In response to these dangerous working conditions, Congress passed the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, known as FELA, to hold the railroads responsible for harms negligently inflicted on their employees. In Consolidated Rail versus Gottshall, the United States Supreme Court contemplated FELA’s scope.

James Gottshall and Alan Carlisle worked for Consolidated Rail, known as Conrail. Gottshall suffered depression and post-traumatic stress disorder after witnessing a close friend die on the job. Carlisle experienced a nervous breakdown allegedly brought on by an exceptionally stressful work environment.

Both men sued Conrail for negligent infliction of emotional distress. In Gottshall’s case, the district court granted Conrail’s motion for summary judgment, ruling that FELA didn’t permit recovery for emotional injuries. Gottshall appealed, and the Third Circuit reversed. In Carlisle’s case, the jury returned a verdict for Carlisle. Conrail appealed, and the Third Circuit affirmed. The United States Supreme Court granted cert and consolidated the two cases.

Want more details on this case? Get the rule of law, issues, holding and reasonings, and more case facts here:

The Quimbee App features over 16,300 case briefs keyed to 223 casebooks. Try it free for 7 days! ►

Have Questions about this Case? Submit your questions and get answers from a real attorney here:

Did we just become best friends? Stay connected to Quimbee here: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel ►
Quimbee Case Brief App ►
Facebook ►
Twitter ►
#casebriefs #lawcases #casesummaries

Source: Youtube